Letter from Joseph Wong DUE to the Aware saga, the topic of homosexuality has gotten the public's attention. Having read the views of self-declared "conservative" parents who expressed concern about the openness with which this topic is being discussed — especially in schools — I think these parents need to take a step back and reconsider the big picture. First of all, stopping a child from attending a talk on homosexuality does not protect the child. The fact remains that homosexuality exists, whether or not you prevent your children from learning about it through sanctioned talks and discussions. In fact, you should be thankful that your children are learning about it from experienced professionals and not from misinformed sources. Secondly, one must learn to consider the religious views on homosexuality and understand why the stand some people take can be so uncompromising. Thirdly, education is key. Whether this lifestyle is regarded as a choice or a condition, homosexuality is something we cannot deny as a society. The more we understand it, the better equipped we are to make the decision that conforms to our beliefs and principles without treating the topic as taboo. From TODAY, Voices – Wednesday, 06-May-2009
Below is an article lifted from Today daily, a comment to a comment to a comment on additional lessons to schoolchildren conducted during school holidays. I agree with this one. Do you?
-----
More lessons are not always better
Letter from HO KONG LOON
I REFER to the letter “Why lament extra school lessons?” (May 29) by Goh Kian Huat. The writer does not understand what goes on in our schools. Generally, in the education sector, the perception is that more is better. The reason is obvious: School heads favour teachers who go the extra mile, giving extra lessons being one of the requisites.
Teachers conduct supplementary and remedial lessons during term time. In some instances, these extra lessons are held three times a week, each one lasting two to three hours. I know of a school where extra lessons were held on weekends.
Even so, during term time, many teachers are finding it increasingly difficult to teach students who are inattentive, disruptive, noisy, quarrelsome, lazy or just indifferent.
Extra lessons do not add to the learners’ academic storehouse if they are just not keen to learn. Extra lessons are only necessary for slower and weaker learners to reinforce key points of lessons or to remedy pupils’ weaknesses through extra tests and discussions.
It is not mandatory to have extra lessons just to assuage the angst of nervous or demanding parents. Equating conducting extra lessons to diligence or commitment misses the issue altogether. The law of diminishing returns negates the assumption that more is always better.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=fac0104e-195d-407a-a381-a36e488ae2fc)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a4e41871-62e6-42f7-881e-a3090a93f32e)